Cold chain e commerce produce cost refers to the expense of shipping fruits and vegetables through temperature controlled networks to online shoppers. In 2025, last mile delivery accounts for 53 % of total shipping costs, and U.S. e grocery sales reached US$9.7 billion in March 2025, with US$4.2 billion spent on delivery alone. As more consumers buy groceries online—analysts predict up to 155 million Americans will shop for groceries digitally—businesses must manage refrigeration, packaging and fast delivery without eroding margins. This guide helps you understand what drives costs, how to optimise each component and what trends will shape cold chain e commerce in 2025 and beyond.
This article will answer:
What factors influence cold chain e commerce produce costs? – exploring last mile expenses, labour, fuel, packaging and technology.
How do packaging options affect cost and product integrity? – comparing foam, vacuum panels, phase change materials and eco friendly innovations.
How is last mile delivery reshaping produce logistics? – examining cost per delivery, consumer expectations and route optimisation.
What trends and technologies are driving cold chain e commerce in 2025? – assessing IoT sensors, AI route planning, micro fulfilment and sustainability.
How can you optimise operations and reduce costs? – providing practical tips on packaging, route planning, compliance and partnerships.
What factors influence cold chain e commerce produce costs?
Direct answer
Cold chain e commerce produce costs are shaped by last mile delivery, packaging, labour, fuel, technology and regulatory compliance. The last mile now represents 53 % of total shipping costs, reflecting the expense of delivering perishable goods directly to consumers. Packaging quality and type determine insulation performance, hold time and waste, while labour accounts for up to 50–60 % of last mile expenses. Fuel and vehicle maintenance add 10–25 % and ~20 % respectively, and investments in IoT, AI and route optimisation software are essential for efficiency. Regulatory frameworks such as the FSMA Rule 204 require 24 hour traceability for high risk foods, adding compliance costs.
Expanded explanation
From a business perspective, the last mile is the largest cost driver. According to SmartRoutes, the last mile consumes 53 % of total shipping costs, up from 41 % in 2018, because urban congestion, driver shortages and consumer expectations for same day delivery drive up labour and fuel expenses. Urban deliveries cost about US$10 per package, while rural deliveries can exceed US$50 due to longer routes and lower drop densities. Specialty services such as grocery delivery cost US$10–20 per package because of temperature control, fragility and strict time windows, yet customers are typically charged only about US$8, forcing businesses to absorb the difference.
Packaging influences both cost and product integrity. Reusable insulated containers may have higher upfront costs but reduce long term waste and per trip expense. Packaging must align with product weight, temperature range and transit time; mismatched packaging leads to spoilage and extra coolant. Labour—drivers, pickers and packers—accounts for roughly 50–60 % of last mile costs, and wages for express drivers average around US$25.10 per hour. Fuel accounts for 10–25 % of expenses, reflecting low fuel efficiency (6.5 mpg) and idling losses. Maintenance and technology add another 30–35 %, covering vehicle upkeep, route optimisation software and temperature monitoring platforms. Compliance with food safety regulations (FSMA) requires digital recordkeeping and real time monitoring.
Breakdown of cost factors
| Cost component | Typical range | Impact on cold chain e commerce produce | What it means for you |
| Last mile delivery | 53 % of total shipping cost; US$10–50 per package | High due to labour and fuel; impacts final price consumers pay | Optimise routes, consolidate deliveries, choose appropriate vehicles |
| Labour | 50–60 % of last mile cost; wages around US$25/hr | Skilled drivers and pickers are necessary for time sensitive produce | Invest in automation and training; reduce idle time |
| Fuel & maintenance | Fuel 10–25 %; maintenance ~20 %; 6.5 mpg average | Refrigerated vehicles consume more fuel and require frequent maintenance | Use fuel efficient trucks, predictive maintenance and composite materials |
| Packaging | Varies by material: EPS foam, VIP, EPP, PCM (see next section) | Determines insulation, weight and reusability; influences coolant needs | Choose materials based on route duration and sustainability goals |
| Technology & compliance | IoT sensors, AI route planners, blockchain; FSMA Rule 204 | Essential for real time monitoring, traceability and regulatory adherence | Budget for software subscriptions and training; adopt digital platforms |
Practical tips and suggestions
Analyse your delivery geography: Urban routes may accommodate denser drop offs, reducing cost per package, while rural routes require strategic consolidation. Use predictive analytics to identify high density pockets and cluster deliveries.
Invest in fuel efficient equipment: Light duty trucks with composite panels improve thermal efficiency and reduce weight, enhancing fuel economy and payload. Upgrading to modern refrigeration units lowers fuel consumption and extends vehicle lifespan.
Balance labour and technology: Deploy routing software to reduce driver miles and idle time; cross train staff for packing, loading and customer service. Automation in warehouses (e.g., conveyor belts, robotic pickers) reduces labour costs while maintaining speed.
Stay compliant: Implement real time temperature monitoring and digital traceability to meet FSMA Rule 204. Document temperature logs and location data to prevent recalls and fines.
Real world example: In Mexico, nearly 30 % of consumers aged 16–64 buy food online each week. With e commerce sales growing 24.6 % and mobile usage at 90 %, refrigerated transport has become a competitive differentiator. Thermo King notes that inadequate temperature control can cause a shipment to lose value in minutes; companies investing in efficient vehicles and IoT monitoring maintain product quality and gain market share.
How do packaging options affect cold chain e commerce produce cost?
Direct answer
Packaging selection determines insulation performance, weight, hold time and environmental impact—key factors that influence cold chain e commerce produce cost. Common materials include expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam, polyurethane (PUR) boards, vacuum insulated panels (VIPs), phase change materials (PCMs) and innovative eco friendly options like feather based liners and seaweed bioplastics. Each option offers trade offs between cost, thermal protection, reusability and sustainability.
Expanded explanation
In 2025 the cold chain packaging market is valued between US$27.7 billion and US$34.08 billion, and analysts project it could reach US$64.49 billion by 2032. Growth drivers include rising demand for fresh produce, e commerce grocery orders, biologics and vaccines. For e commerce produce, packaging must preserve freshness during transit, often spanning 24–48 hours. EPS/PUR foam remains the workhorse for meal kits and produce shipments due to its low cost and R value (~7 per inch). However, single use foam faces recyclability issues and regulatory pressure. Vacuum Insulated Panels (VIPs) offer thermal conductivity as low as 0.0043 W/(m·K) and maintain 2–8 °C for up to 72 hours; paired with PCMs, they can extend hold times but come at a higher cost. Phase Change Materials absorb latent heat to keep temperatures stable; PCMs covering –75 °C to +151 °C are reusable and non hazardous, making them ideal for longer routes. Eco friendly innovations such as feather based liners, seaweed bioplastics and wood fibre reduce environmental impact while providing comparable insulation. Reusable Expanded Polypropylene (EPP) boxes offer durability and cost efficiency when used over hundreds of cycles; their price varies by density, wall thickness and lid interface.
Comparative table of packaging materials
| Packaging option | Thermal performance & hold time | Environmental impact | Practical meaning |
| EPS/PUR foam | R ≈ 7 per inch; suitable for 24–72 h shipments | Low recyclability; being phased out by regulations | Economical choice for meal kits and produce; good for short routes but generates waste |
| High performance foams (PIR blends) | Improved stability; higher R values | Contains recycled content; supports circular economy | Suitable for longer routes and repeated use; reduces waste |
| Vacuum Insulated Panels (VIPs) | Ultra low thermal conductivity (0.0043 W/m·K); maintain 2–8 °C up to 72 h | Reusable; higher cost but reduces coolant needs | Ideal for long haul shipments and high value produce; reduces dry ice usage |
| Phase Change Materials (PCMs) | Maintain stable temperatures across broad ranges; extend hold times beyond 72 h | Reusable, non toxic and non hazardous | Perfect for precise temperature control; use with VIPs for long or cross border shipments |
| Feather based insulation | 15 % lower thermal conductivity than EPS; >120 h at –20 °C | Recycled natural by product; biodegradable | Great for frozen vegetables and long haul routes; supports circular economy |
| Seaweed bioplastics | Comparable insulation to conventional foam; dissolves in water | Biodegradable; leaves no microplastics | Ideal for meal kits and seafood; reduces plastic waste |
| EPP boxes (portable) | Hold temperature depending on density and wall thickness; robust for many cycles | Durable and reusable; reduces waste and cost per trip | Suitable for last mile deliveries; cost per trip decreases with reuse; adjust density and lid fit to product risk |
Practical tips and suggestions
Match material to route time: Use EPS or PIR foams for short (<48 h) deliveries; choose VIPs and PCMs for long distance or cross border shipments requiring extended hold times.
Right size coolant: Determine the required coolant weight using real transit time and ambient conditions. Under packing risks spoilage; over packing wastes space and increases weight.
Evaluate reuse potential: For frequent e commerce routes, invest in high density EPP boxes with interlocking lids and handles. Although they cost more upfront, they survive hundreds of cycles. Compare vendor quotes by density, wall thickness and lid seal quality instead of unit price.
Adopt eco friendly innovations: Consider feather based or seaweed insulation for sustainable branding. These materials perform well and differentiate your brand in an environmentally conscious market.
Real world case: A meal kit operator paid more for high density EPP boxes with interlocking lids but dramatically reduced reships because the containers survived rough handling and maintained temperature. The investment cut cost per trip and improved customer satisfaction.
How is last mile delivery reshaping e commerce produce logistics in 2025?
Direct answer
Last mile delivery is the most expensive and complex segment of cold chain e commerce produce logistics, accounting for over half of total shipping costs. Consumer expectations for speed and transparency are soaring—77 % of shoppers want 2 hour deliveries, 80 % expect same day delivery and 92 % prioritise free shipping. Companies must balance these demands with cost control by leveraging route optimisation, micro fulfilment centres and technology such as real time tracking and composite truck bodies.
Expanded explanation
Consumer expectations have fundamentally changed the economics of delivery. Research shows that 77 % of online shoppers expect delivery within two hours for certain products, while 80 % consider same day delivery standard. More than 90 % of customers abandon carts when shipping costs are high, emphasising the need for free or low cost delivery options. At the same time, around 91 % of customers actively track their packages, requiring real time updates on shipment status.
Delivering perishable produce intensifies these pressures because temperature control reduces flexibility. Grocery deliveries cost US$10–20 per package due to special handling, but customers typically pay only US$8. Businesses must absorb the difference or cross subsidise with other product lines. Failed deliveries occur at rates of 8–20 %, costing nearly US$17.78 per failure—often because of inaccurate addresses or missed delivery windows. Temperature excursions or delays result in product spoilage, further eroding margins.
Technological innovation offers solutions. Composite truck bodies weigh less and insulate better, reducing fuel consumption and refrigeration demand. Light duty trucks with multi temperature compartments enable simultaneous delivery of frozen, chilled and ambient goods. Route optimisation software reduces miles driven, idling and driver stress, while real time tracking platforms provide visibility to consumers and logistic managers. Investments in micro fulfilment centres near urban areas shorten last mile distances and enable quick pickups; they also support flexible delivery windows and reduce storage costs. Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) in warehouses increase throughput and reduce labour requirements.
Key last mile statistics
| Metric | Value | Source & meaning | Relevance to you |
| Last mile share of shipping costs | 53 % (2024) | Last mile dominates cost structure for e commerce deliveries | Optimise last mile operations to control budget |
| Average cost per grocery delivery | US$10–20 per package | High because of temperature control and time sensitivity | Use route optimisation and consolidation to lower per package cost |
| Consumer expectations for 2 hour delivery | 77 % | Shoppers demand rapid delivery for perishable goods | Offer time slot selection and micro fulfilment centres |
| Consumers expecting same day delivery | 80 % | Same day has become mainstream for groceries | Plan inventory and dispatch to meet this expectation |
| Consumers valuing free shipping | 92 % | Free shipping influences purchase decisions | Incorporate shipping costs into product pricing or subscription models |
| Consumers actively tracking packages | 91 % | Real time tracking is now a baseline requirement | Implement IoT sensors and delivery notifications |
| Failed delivery rate | 8–20 %; cost per failure ≈ US$17.78 | Missed deliveries destroy profitability | Verify addresses, offer flexible delivery windows and communicate proactively |
Practical tips and suggestions
Adopt micro fulfilment hubs: Establish small, refrigerated warehouses close to urban consumers. They shorten last mile routes and enable same day or 2 hour deliveries.
Optimise routes continuously: Use AI powered routing tools that account for traffic, weather and delivery windows. Continuous adjustments reduce delays and fuel waste.
Offer delivery window flexibility: Allow customers to choose time slots or pick up points to minimise failed deliveries. Provide real time notifications and options to reschedule.
Leverage composite vehicles: Invest in trucks with composite insulation to reduce energy consumption and extend refrigeration hold time. These vehicles are lighter and can carry more produce per trip.
Monitor and adjust temperature: Equip vehicles with IoT sensors to record temperature and humidity, sending alerts for deviations. Data transparency builds consumer trust and complies with FSMA.
Real world case: U.S. e grocery sales reached US$9.7 billion in March 2025 and US$4.2 billion was spent on delivery, demonstrating the enormous financial weight of last mile logistics. Major retailers have invested in mobile apps, AI recommendations and automated fulfilment centres, but the backbone remains temperature controlled transportation. Composite body trucks provide thermal efficiency and improved payloads, reducing fuel consumption and supporting sustainability goals.
What trends and technologies are driving cold chain e commerce produce in 2025?
Trend overview
The cold chain industry is undergoing transformational change. Digitalisation—including IoT sensors, AI route optimisation and blockchain—is no longer optional. SmartRoutes and other platforms deliver real time temperature, humidity and location data, enabling proactive intervention and predictive maintenance. Artificial intelligence minimises delays, predicts equipment failures and optimises inventory. Blockchain provides tamper proof records of each handoff, ensuring product authenticity and compliance. Renewable refrigeration solutions such as solar powered storage and natural refrigerants reduce energy costs and emissions. Market demand is shifting, with Millennials driving e commerce produce and representing 68 % of all new produce dollars. These trends collectively push companies to rethink infrastructure, packaging and delivery models.
Latest progress at a glance
Micro fulfilment and urban cold hubs: As e grocery grows, companies are building micro fulfilment centres near cities. Analysts expect a surge in micro fulfilment cold storage hubs by 2025–2026. These facilities enable fast delivery and reduce inventory holding costs.
Sustainable innovations: Feather based, seaweed and wood fibre insulation reduce environmental impact while maintaining thermal performance. Solar powered refrigeration is scaling in regions with limited electricity, cutting energy costs from 13.10 cents per kWh to 3.2 cents.
IoT and predictive analytics: Digital platforms cut downtime by up to 50 %, reduce repair costs 10–20 % and save 10–30 % of energy. Sensors provide continuous temperature tracking and alerts, satisfying regulatory requirements and reducing waste.
Rising cross border e commerce: Cold chain demand extends beyond food and pharmaceuticals. MarketsAndMarkets notes that 2025 sees growth in cosmeceuticals and gene therapies as well as cross border e commerce shipments requiring controlled environments. This expands the need for reliable packaging and efficient logistics.
Labour automation and robotics: Cold storage facilities are adopting Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) and Automated Storage & Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) to boost throughput and reduce labour costs. These systems improve accuracy and safety in refrigerated environments.
Sustainability commitments: Companies invest in electric vehicles, natural gas powered units, low energy refrigeration and intermodal transport to reduce carbon emissions. Consumer demand for sustainability influences packaging choices and brand loyalty.
Market insights
Consumer preferences and market size provide context for these trends:
Produce consumption shift: Millennials now account for 68 % of new produce dollars, a US$4 billion growth story influencing packaging and distribution patterns. Value added produce (e.g., pre cut or ready to eat) represents just 8 % of volume but commands higher rates and needs specialised handling.
Food cold chain market: The global food cold chain market is valued at US$65.8 billion in 2025 and projected to reach US$205.3 billion by 2032. The broader cold chain logistics market has climbed to US$436 billion.
Market expansion: In the USA, the fresh produce cold chain market is worth US$20 billion, driven by demand for organic, locally sourced food and e commerce expansion. California, Florida and Texas are key hubs. The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) enforces stricter regulations on fresh produce transport.
Vegetable losses: Up to 526 million tonnes of food (12 % of global production) are lost annually due to insufficient cold chains. Vegetables can experience post harvest losses exceeding 50 % in regions without refrigeration. Improving cold chains could feed more than 1 billion people and reduce 8–10 % of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Mexico’s digital adoption: Nearly 30 % of Mexican consumers buy food online weekly, with 51 % purchasing prepared food and 43 % buying packaged food. These figures underscore the growth of e commerce produce across Latin America.
Best practices for optimising cold chain e commerce produce operations
Direct answer
Optimising cold chain e commerce produce requires a holistic approach: choose the right packaging, maintain proper temperature ranges, optimise routes, invest in micro fulfilment and comply with regulatory requirements. Adopt IoT sensors, predictive analytics and renewable technologies to reduce waste and energy costs. Develop partnerships with specialised logistics providers and involve consumers in sustainable practices.
Expanded explanation
Packaging and temperature management: Use insulated containers appropriate for the product and route duration. For fresh leafy greens, maintain 0–4 °C; root vegetables can tolerate 10–13 °C, while frozen vegetables need –18 °C to –23 °C. Pre cool vegetables quickly using blast chillers or forced air cooling to minimise ice crystal formation. Monitor humidity and use breathable films to prevent wilting.
Route optimisation and micro fulfilment: Implement AI driven routing to reduce miles and idle time. Establish micro fulfilment hubs near major urban centres to speed up deliveries and lower energy consumption. Use multi compartment vehicles to deliver various temperature zones in one trip. Offer flexible delivery windows and alternative pick up points to reduce failed deliveries.
Technology adoption: Deploy IoT sensors and data loggers to continuously monitor temperature, humidity and location. Integrate blockchain for transparent and tamper proof recordkeeping. Use predictive analytics to schedule maintenance and avoid equipment failure. Renewable energy sources, such as solar powered refrigeration, can cut energy costs by up to 75 % in some cases.
Labour and automation: Cross train staff and invest in warehouse automation (AMRs, AS/RS) to reduce labour costs and errors. Develop incentives for drivers to ensure on time delivery and safe handling. Provide training on temperature control and digital tools.
Compliance and sustainability: Adhere to FSMA Rule 204 and other regional regulations by maintaining digital records and ensuring traceability within 24 hours. Choose reusable or recyclable packaging materials to meet EU and global sustainability mandates. Educate consumers about recycling packaging or participating in return programmes.
Case study
Example: A Southeast Asian distributor installed solar powered cold storage and IoT monitoring, reducing energy costs from 13.10 ¢ per kWh to 3.2 ¢ and maintaining vaccines at ultra low temperatures. Applying similar systems to produce logistics cut energy bills while ensuring compliance and quality. Additional benefits included fewer product recalls and extended shelf life.
Table: Temperature recommendations for common produce
| Produce category | Recommended temperature | Rationale | Application |
| Fresh leafy greens | 0–4 °C | Prevents wilting and microbial growth | Use high humidity containers and rapid cooling |
| Root vegetables | 10–13 °C | Warmer temperatures prevent chilling injury | Pack with breathable liners to avoid condensation |
| Tropical vegetables | 10–13 °C with moderate humidity | Prevents cold damage; maintains flavour | Avoid ice or excessive coolant; use PCMs for stable temperatures |
| Frozen vegetables | –18 °C to –23 °C | Stops enzymatic reactions and retains texture | Use PCMs or dry ice; combine with VIPs for long hold times |
Frequently asked questions
Q1: How much does cold chain e commerce produce delivery cost per package?
Grocery deliveries typically cost US$10–20 per package because of temperature control and strict time requirements. However, consumers are usually charged only about US$8, meaning businesses absorb the difference. Optimising routes and packaging can narrow this gap.
Q2: Which packaging material is best for e commerce produce?
For shipments lasting less than two days, EPS or high performance foams offer affordable insulation. For longer or cross border routes, use VIPs combined with PCMs for extended hold times. Eco friendly options like feather based liners and seaweed bioplastics provide sustainability without sacrificing performance.
Q3: How can I reduce last mile cold chain costs?
Establish micro fulfilment hubs, use AI route optimisation, leverage composite body trucks for better fuel efficiency and offer flexible delivery windows. Consolidate deliveries to increase drop density and reduce miles traveled.
Q4: What temperature range should I maintain for fresh produce?
Maintain 0–4 °C for leafy greens, 10–13 °C for root and tropical vegetables, and –18 °C to –23 °C for frozen vegetables. Use sensors and data loggers to monitor conditions continuously and record compliance.
Q5: Why is real time tracking important in cold chain e commerce?
Approximately 91 % of consumers actively track their packages. Real time tracking provides transparency, builds trust and allows quick intervention if temperature deviations occur, ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance.
2025 trends and developments in cold chain e commerce produce
Trend overview
In 2025 several major developments are shaping the cold chain e commerce produce landscape:
Smart cold chain technologies: IoT sensors, AI and blockchain provide continuous monitoring, route optimisation and tamper proof records. Digital tools reduce downtime by up to 50 % and cut repair costs 10–20 %.
Micro fulfilment and urban hubs: E grocery demand triggers investment in urban micro fulfilment centres, enabling 2 hour deliveries and reducing storage costs.
Sustainability initiatives: Businesses adopt eco friendly packaging, renewable refrigeration and electric vehicles to meet consumer expectations and regulatory requirements.
New regulatory frameworks: FSMA Rule 204 in the U.S. mandates 24 hour traceability for high risk foods; the EU Packaging & Waste Directive pushes for recyclable and reusable packaging.
Consumer demand and market growth: Millennials drive produce consumption and e commerce adoption; cross border e commerce expands to include cosmeceuticals and gene therapies.
Latest progress at a glance
| Progress | Description | Practical implication |
| Composite truck bodies | Advanced composites replace metal posts in refrigerated trucks, reducing weight and improving insulation | Lower fuel consumption and extended refrigeration hold times; increased payload capacity |
| Solar powered cold storage | Solar units cut electricity costs by ~75 % and support off grid operations | Lower operating expenses; improved sustainability; ideal for rural micro fulfilment |
| Feather/seaweed insulation | New materials reduce thermal conductivity and are biodegradable | Enhances brand sustainability and reduces waste; supports long haul shipments |
| Sensor fusion and analytics | Integration of IoT, predictive analytics and AI route planning | Reduces spoilage and energy consumption; enhances compliance and customer satisfaction |
| AI driven demand forecasting | Predictive models align inventory with orders and weather patterns | Minimises waste and stockouts; improves on time delivery |
| Expansion of cross border produce trade | Annual growth of 5.6 % in perishable exports; emerging economies expand cold storage capacity | Opens new markets and requires robust packaging and documentation |
Market insights
The produce supply chain is evolving in response to consumer preferences and climate impacts. Shelflife preservation is critical: about 13 % of global food production is lost due to inadequate cold chains, and improving refrigeration could feed more than 1 billion people. Meal kits and ready to eat vegetables drive demand for reliable packaging and precise temperature control. Investments in digitalisation and sustainable materials deliver cost savings and brand differentiation, while regulatory frameworks push companies toward transparency and recyclability.
Summary and recommendations
Cold chain e commerce produce costs are influenced by a complex interplay of logistics, packaging, labour, technology and consumer expectations. Last mile delivery accounts for more than half of total shipping costs, with grocery deliveries costing US$10–20 per package. Packaging choices—from EPS and high performance foams to VIPs, PCMs and eco friendly innovations—affect insulation performance, sustainability and cost. Technology adoption including IoT sensors, AI route optimisation and blockchain enhances visibility, reduces waste and ensures compliance. Micro fulfilment centres, composite vehicles and renewable refrigeration offer practical solutions to meet consumer demands for rapid delivery while reducing costs and emissions. Market trends show continued growth in e grocery sales, rising cold chain investments and stricter regulations.
Actionable next steps
Assess your product needs: Determine temperature ranges and hold times for your produce. Select packaging based on route duration and sustainability goals. Use PCMs and VIPs for long trips; choose eco friendly materials to appeal to environmentally conscious customers.
Optimise your last mile: Deploy AI powered route optimisation and micro fulfilment hubs. Offer flexible delivery windows and consolidate shipments to reduce cost per package.
Invest in technology: Implement IoT sensors, predictive analytics and blockchain to monitor temperature, humidity and location. Use data to schedule maintenance, predict demand and ensure compliance.
Adopt sustainable practices: Switch to composite vehicles, renewable refrigeration and recyclable or reusable packaging. Educate consumers about recycling programmes and encourage box returns.
Partner with experts: Collaborate with cold chain specialists who offer end to end solutions. Negotiate long term contracts and share data to improve efficiency.
About Tempk
Tempk is a leading innovator in cold chain packaging and logistics solutions. We design reusable insulated boxes, gel packs, VIP liners and phase change materials tailored for food, pharmaceutical and biotech shipments. Our research team focuses on sustainability by developing eco friendly materials like seaweed bioplastics and feather based insulation. We leverage IoT sensors and solar powered refrigeration to reduce energy costs and carbon footprints. By partnering with Tempk, you gain access to cutting edge packaging, predictive analytics and a commitment to quality and compliance.
Call to action
Ready to optimise your e commerce produce operations? Contact Tempk’s experts for a personalised consultation. We’ll help you select the right packaging, plan efficient routes and implement technology that reduces cost while protecting product quality. Together we can build a more sustainable and profitable cold chain.
